<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEERESD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Education Research and Sustainable Development</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JEERESD</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="electronic">3078-2112</issn><publisher><publisher-name>EcoClean Environment Company</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEE-20260902-BFE96BAB</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.68305/jeeresd.v4i4.006</article-id><title-group><article-title>Quantifying the Net Environmental Benefits of Food-Grade Recycled PET in Cameroon: Application of the Circular Footprint Formula to Mid-Scale Mechanical Recycling</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Lele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><role vocab="credit">Conceptualization</role><role vocab="credit">Data curation</role><role vocab="credit">Formal analysis</role><role vocab="credit">Funding acquisition</role><role vocab="credit">Investigation</role><role vocab="credit">Methodology</role><role vocab="credit">Resources</role><role vocab="credit">Software</role><role vocab="credit">Writing – original draft</role><role vocab="credit">Supervision</role></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aghaindum</surname><given-names>Ajeagah Gideon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><role vocab="credit">Validation</role><role vocab="credit">Writing – review &amp; editing</role></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elambo</surname><given-names>Nkeng George</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/><role vocab="credit">Writing – review &amp; editing</role><role vocab="credit">Supervision</role></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1">National Advanced School of Public Works</aff><aff id="aff2">University of Yaoundé 1, Faculty of Sciences</aff><aff id="aff3">National Advanced School of Public Works</aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><abstract><p>Mechanical recycling is often assumed, rather than demonstrated, to deliver a net environmental benefit relative to virgin plastic production, particularly in Sub-Saharan African contexts where primary process data are scarce. This study quantifies that benefit for food-grade recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) produced at mid-scale in Cameroon, using the European Commission’s Circular Footprint Formula (CFF) applied to a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA; ISO 14040/14044) of the Opur and Supermont mineral-water bottle streams recycled at Ecogreen Sarl, Douala. Primary inventory data were obtained from a 90-day, three-shift production campaign combining calibrated mass, electricity and water metering; a parallel material flow analysis (MFA) established a mass-balance closure. The Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 method, implemented in openLCA with ecoinvent v3.10 background data, characterised the gate-to-gate process impact at 186 kg CO2-eq per tonne of food-grade rPET pellets. Applying the CFF converted this process impact into an effective, credit-adjusted climate-change footprint of approximately 1,600 kg CO2-eq per tonne, corresponding to an avoided impact of 27.2% relative to a linear baseline of virgin production plus landfilling. Comparable avoided impacts were obtained for acidification (28.4%), fossil resource use (29.8%) and particulate matter (27.0%), while human toxicity indicators showed a net increase (-5.8% for cancer effects, -21.2% for non-cancer effects) attributable to ancillary chemical and energy inputs. Freshwater eutrophication and ecotoxicity, driven by wastewater treatment, and climate change and fossil-resource depletion, driven by electricity and diesel-fuelled thermal energy, dominated the normalised impact profile. Material flow analysis identified oversized 10-litre bottles as the single largest documented loss pathway at the flake-production stage (8.3% of PET bottle feed), a design-process mismatch rather than a contamination problem. A ceteris-paribus parametric sensitivity analysis, holding the recycling-process impact, end-of-life recycling rate, allocation factor and quality ratios fixed, shows the CFF-derived climate benefit increasing monotonically with the input recycled-content rate above the 25% baseline; because this response is a mathematical property of the CFF equation rather than independently tested evidence of technical feasibility, it is presented as a policy-relevant scenario rather than a demonstrated ceiling. Uncertainty was propagated through 10,000 Monte-Carlo iterations for the recycling-process inventory. Subject to these caveats, the results indicate that the CFF, parameterised with primary process data, provides a policy-relevant quantification of circularity benefit even where recycling operates below the collection and technology standards of mature economies, and that recycled-content policy, alongside process-level efficiency improvement, remains an influential lever for improving the environmental return of food-grade PET recycling in Cameroon.</p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated"><kwd>Circular Footprint Formula</kwd><kwd>life cycle assessment</kwd><kwd>material flow analysis</kwd><kwd>recycled PET</kwd><kwd>food-grade recycling</kwd><kwd>circular economy</kwd><kwd>Sub-Saharan Africa</kwd></kwd-group><permissions><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://jeeresd.online/article/quantifying-net-environmental-benefits-food-grade-recycled-pet-cameroon/article.pdf"/></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="abstract"><title>Abstract</title><p>Mechanical recycling is often assumed, rather than demonstrated, to deliver a net environmental benefit relative to virgin plastic production, particularly in Sub-Saharan African contexts where primary process data are scarce. This study quantifies that benefit for food-grade recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) produced at mid-scale in Cameroon, using the European Commission’s Circular Footprint Formula (CFF) applied to a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA; ISO 14040/14044) of the Opur and Supermont mineral-water bottle streams recycled at Ecogreen Sarl, Douala. Primary inventory data were obtained from a 90-day, three-shift production campaign combining calibrated mass, electricity and water metering; a parallel material flow analysis (MFA) established a mass-balance closure. The Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 method, implemented in openLCA with ecoinvent v3.10 background data, characterised the gate-to-gate process impact at 186 kg CO2-eq per tonne of food-grade rPET pellets. Applying the CFF converted this process impact into an effective, credit-adjusted climate-change footprint of approximately 1,600 kg CO2-eq per tonne, corresponding to an avoided impact of 27.2% relative to a linear baseline of virgin production plus landfilling. Comparable avoided impacts were obtained for acidification (28.4%), fossil resource use (29.8%) and particulate matter (27.0%), while human toxicity indicators showed a net increase (-5.8% for cancer effects, -21.2% for non-cancer effects) attributable to ancillary chemical and energy inputs. Freshwater eutrophication and ecotoxicity, driven by wastewater treatment, and climate change and fossil-resource depletion, driven by electricity and diesel-fuelled thermal energy, dominated the normalised impact profile. Material flow analysis identified oversized 10-litre bottles as the single largest documented loss pathway at the flake-production stage (8.3% of PET bottle feed), a design-process mismatch rather than a contamination problem. A ceteris-paribus parametric sensitivity analysis, holding the recycling-process impact, end-of-life recycling rate, allocation factor and quality ratios fixed, shows the CFF-derived climate benefit increasing monotonically with the input recycled-content rate above the 25% baseline; because this response is a mathematical property of the CFF equation rather than independently tested evidence of technical feasibility, it is presented as a policy-relevant scenario rather than a demonstrated ceiling. Uncertainty was propagated through 10,000 Monte-Carlo iterations for the recycling-process inventory. Subject to these caveats, the results indicate that the CFF, parameterised with primary process data, provides a policy-relevant quantification of circularity benefit even where recycling operates below the collection and technology standards of mature economies, and that recycled-content policy, alongside process-level efficiency improvement, remains an influential lever for improving the environmental return of food-grade PET recycling in Cameroon.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="R1"><mixed-citation>Afrik21.africa. (2023, January 8). Ecogreen, a new start-up for plastic waste recycling in Cameroon. https://www.expadd.org/en/cameroon-ecogreen-a-new-start-up-for-plastic-waste-recycling/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><mixed-citation>Allacker, K., Mathieux, F., Pennington, D., &amp; Pant, R. (2017). The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(9), 1441-1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1244-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><mixed-citation>Barkhausen, R., Rostek, L., Miao, Z. C., &amp; Zeller, V. (2022). Combinations of material flow analysis and life cycle assessment and their applicability to assess circular economy requirements in EU product regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, Article 137017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><mixed-citation>Bataineh, K. M. (2020). Life-cycle assessment of recycling postconsumer high-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8905431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><mixed-citation>Benyathiar, P., Kumar, P., Carpenter, G., Brace, J., &amp; Mishra, D. K. (2022). Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle-to-bottle recycling for the beverage industry: A review. Polymers, 14(15), Article 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122366</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><mixed-citation>Brunner, P. H., &amp; Rechberger, H. (2016). Handbook of material flow analysis: For environment, resource, and waste engineers (2nd ed.). CRC Press. 456 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315313450</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><mixed-citation>Business in Cameroon. (2017). Cameroon: Source du Pays captured 61.7% of mineral water market shares in 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><mixed-citation>Business in Cameroon. (2026). Cameroon generates 7.2 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><mixed-citation>Chaudhari, U. S., Johnson, A. T., Reck, B. K., Handler, R. M., Thompson, V. S., Hartley, S. H., Young, W., Watkins, D., &amp; Shonnard, D. (2022). Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment of polyethylene terephthalate and polyolefin plastics supply chains in the United States. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 10, 13145-13155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><mixed-citation>Ciroth, A., Muller, S., Weidema, B. P., &amp; Lesage, P. (2016). Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1338-1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0670-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><mixed-citation>Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., &amp; Blok, K. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy - A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, Article 104498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><mixed-citation>Crawford, C. B., &amp; Quinn, B. (2017). Microplastic pollutants. Elsevier.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><mixed-citation>Eriksen, M. K., Pivnenko, K., Faraca, G., Boldrin, A., &amp; Astrup, T. F. (2020). Dynamic material flow analysis of PET, PE, and PP flows in Europe: Evaluation of the potential for circular economy. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 34(10), 3356-3369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><mixed-citation>European Commission. (2013). Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guide. Joint Research Centre. N 070307/2009/552517.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><mixed-citation>European Commission. (2021). Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Joint Research Centre.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><mixed-citation>Fleischer, G., Schmidt, W. P., &amp; Rebitzer, G. (2001). Functional units in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6(6), 321-326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><mixed-citation>Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., &amp; Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), Article e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><mixed-citation>Godfrey, L., Ahmed, M. T., Gebremedhin, K. G., Katima, J. H. Y., Oelofse, S., Osibanjo, O., Richter, U. H., &amp; Yonli, A. H. (2019). Solid waste management in Africa: Governance failure or development opportunity? In H. Edomah (Ed.), Regional development in Africa (pp. 235-247). IntechOpen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><mixed-citation>Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., &amp; Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 344, 179-199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><mixed-citation>Haupt, M., &amp; Hellweg, S. (2019). Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 1-2, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R21"><mixed-citation>Igos, E., Benetto, E., Meyer, R., Baustert, P., &amp; Othoniel, B. (2019). Uncertainty in LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R22"><mixed-citation>International Organization for Standardization. (2006a). ISO 14040: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R23"><mixed-citation>International Organization for Standardization. (2006b). ISO 14044: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R24"><mixed-citation>Jeswani, H. K., Azapagic, A., &amp; Schebek, L. (2024). LCA of rPET in PEF context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, Article 140012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R25"><mixed-citation>Jolliet, O., Müller-Wenk, R., Bare, J., Brent, A., Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Itsubo, N., Peña, C., Pennington, D., Potting, J., Rebitzer, G., Stewart, M., De Haes, H. A. U., &amp; Weidema, B. (2004). The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(6), 394-404. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.09.175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R26"><mixed-citation>Lavers Westin, A., Kalmykova, Y., Rosado, L., Oliveira, F., Laurenti, R., &amp; Rydberg, T. (2019). Combining material flow analysis with life cycle assessment to identify hotspots of urban consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 526-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.036.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R27"><mixed-citation>Lele, C. (2025). Optimising environmental performance of the recycling of polyethylene terephthalate bottles in the context of circular economy: Case of mineral water (Opur and Supermont) bottles [Master&apos;s thesis]. National Advanced School of Public Works, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R28"><mixed-citation>MINEPDED. (2024). National Strategy to Combat Plastic Pollution. Ministry of Environment, Protection of Nature and Sustainable Development, Cameroon. https://minepded.gov.cm/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/NATIONAL-STRATEGY-TO-COMBAT-PLASTIC-POLLUTION.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R29"><mixed-citation>NAPCOR. (2025). 2024 PET Recycling Report. National Association for PET Container Resources, 40 p. https://napcor.com/reports-resources/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R30"><mixed-citation>Rigamonti, L., Grosso, M., &amp; Giugliano, M. (2024). PEF-compliant rPET LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 195, Article 107012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R31"><mixed-citation>Rousselet, G. A., &amp; Wilcox, R. R. (2020). Reaction times and other skewed distributions: Problems with the mean and the median. Meta-Psychology, 4, Article 1630. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2019.1630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R32"><mixed-citation>Santomasi, G., Todaro, F., Petrella, A., Notarnicola, M., &amp; Thoden van Velzen, E. U. (2024). Mechanical recycling of PET multi-layer post-consumer packaging: Effects of impurity content. Recycling, 9(5), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling9050093.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R33"><mixed-citation>Shen, L., Worrell, E., &amp; Patel, M. K. (2010). Environmental impact assessment of mechanical and feedstock recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R34"><mixed-citation>Weidema, B. P., Bauer, C., Hischier, R., Mutel, C., Nemecek, T., Reinhard, J., Vadenbo, C. O., &amp; Wernet, G. (2013). Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R35"><mixed-citation>Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., &amp; Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(9), 1218-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R36"><mixed-citation>Yeboaa, C., Tetteh, E. K., Chollom, M. N., &amp; Rathilal, S. (2025). Sustainable solutions for plastic waste mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Polymers, 17(11), Article 1521.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R37"><mixed-citation>Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>